Skip Navigation



Journal of Economic Geography Advance Access published online on January 31, 2007

Journal of Economic Geography, doi:10.1093/jeg/lbl027
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
7/2/119    most recent
lbl027v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Helsley, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Strange, W. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2007). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Urban interactions and spatial structure

Robert W. Helsley* and William C. Strange**

*Watkinson Professor of Environmental and Land Management, Sauder School of Business, 2053 Main Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z2, Canada.

**Corresponding author: RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust Professor of Real Estate and Urban Economics, Rotman School of Management, 105 St George St., University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3E6, Canada.

This article specifies and solves a model of endogenous spatial interactions where agents choose to visit a particular location to interact with others. Equilibrium fails to achieve first-best levels of visits and population density. A construction subsidy can restore second-best efficiency, but not first-best because it does not operate on the visit margin directly. A transportation subsidy can achieve first best. This result—which contrasts with earlier work—comes from treating interaction as a choice variable, rather than focusing on population density, a correlate. Developers are unable to implement even second-best efficiency because of their limited control over a city's land area.

Keywords: spatial interactions, urban spatial structure,
JEL classifications: R13, R14
Date submitted: 13 October 2005     Date accepted: 5 December 2006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ECON GEOGRHome page
M. Bacolod, B. S. Blum, and W. C. Strange
Urban interactions: soft skills versus specialization
J. Econ. Geogr., March 1, 2009; 9(2): 227 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.