Skip Navigation



Journal of Economic Geography Advance Access published online on November 10, 2005
Journal of Economic Geography, doi:10.1093/jeg/lbi020
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
6/3/323    most recent
lbi020v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baldwin, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Okubo, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2005). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received August 27, 2005
Accepted September 15, 2005

Article

Heterogeneous firms, agglomeration and economic geography: spatial selection and sorting

Richard E. Baldwin 1* and Toshihiro Okubo 1

1 Graduate Institute of International Studies, 11a Ave de la Paix, Geneva 1202, Switzerland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Richard E. Baldwin, E-mail: baldwin{at}hei.unige.ch


  Abstract

A Melitz-style model of monopolistic competition with heterogeneous firms is integrated into a simple new economic geography model to show that the standard assumption of identical firms is neither necessary nor innocuous. We show that relocating to the big region is most attractive for the most productive firms; this implies interesting results for empirical work and policy analysis. A ‘selection effect’ means standard empirical measures overestimate agglomeration economies. A ‘sorting effect’ means that a regional policy induces the highest productivity firms to move to the core and the lowest productivity firms to the periphery. We also show that heterogeneity dampens the home market effect.

Keywords: heterogeneous firms; economic geography; estimation of agglomeration economies; home market effect.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J ECON GEOGRHome page
H. Saito and M. Gopinath
Plants' self-selection, agglomeration economies and regional productivity in Chile
J. Econ. Geogr., July 1, 2009; 9(4): 539 - 558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ECON GEOGRHome page
C. Altomonte and I. Colantone
Firm heterogeneity and endogenous regional disparities
J. Econ. Geogr., November 1, 2008; 8(6): 779 - 810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ECON GEOGRHome page
K. Frenken and R. A. Boschma
A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process
J. Econ. Geogr., September 1, 2007; 7(5): 635 - 649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.