Skip Navigation


Journal of Economic Geography Advance Access originally published online on July 25, 2008
Journal of Economic Geography 2008 8(5):675-698; doi:10.1093/jeg/lbn028
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
8/5/675    most recent
lbn028v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sunley, P.
Right arrow Articles by Macmillen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow L14 - Transactional Relationships; Contracts and Reputation; Networks
Right arrow L84 - Personal, Professional, and Business Services
Right arrow O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
Right arrow R30 - General
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author (2008). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

This article appears in the following Journal of Economic Geography issue: Geography and the Cultural Economy [View the issue table of contents]

Innovation in a creative production system: the case of design

Peter Sunley*, Steven Pinch, Suzanne Reimer and James Macmillen

*Corresponding author: School of Geography, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ UK. email <P.J.Sunley{at}soton.ac.uk>

JEL classifications: O31, L84, R30, L14

This article addresses the relatively neglected issue of variations in the degree of innovation and creativity within cultural production systems, paying particular attention to the design consultancy industry. It argues that design is a business-facing type of creative industry that differs in important ways from other types of cultural industries. It examines some of the implications of this argument for how we should understand innovation and its geography in the industry. It is argued that previous studies have paid too much attention to place-based creative inspiration, thereby downplaying the business ecosystems and firm architectures that drive innovation. It is argued that design innovation requires the combination of a wide range of different types of knowledge. Design emerges from interactions between different sites that synthesize and recombine knowledge so as to produce emergent effects and new designs. The article examines two of the key sites: the market or agency-client link and the design firm itself. It argues that relations with clients, and firm routines and competences, are much more important to design innovation than inter-firm co-operation or the local cultural environment. In conclusion it argues that economic geographers should be wary about using approaches to innovation derived from either cultural or manufacturing industries to explain the local ecology of design, but should devote more research to examining the distinctive logics of innovation in creative, knowledge intensive business service industries.

Keywords: innovation, design, firm, sites
Date submitted: 1 September 2007     Date accepted: 30 April 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Prog Hum GeogrHome page
S. Reimer
Geographies of production III: knowledge, cultural economies and work (revisited)
Progress in Human Geography, October 1, 2009; 33(5): 677 - 684.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J ECON GEOGRHome page
P. Aspers
Using design for upgrading in the fashion industry
J. Econ. Geogr., July 2, 2009; (2009) lbp030v2.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.