Skip Navigation


Journal of Economic Geography Advance Access originally published online on April 14, 2008
Journal of Economic Geography 2008 8(4):497-517; doi:10.1093/jeg/lbn013
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
8/4/497    most recent
lbn013v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Faulconbridge, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow F23 - Multinational Firms; International Business
Right arrow L82 - Entertainment; Media
Right arrow L84 - Personal, Professional, and Business Services
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author (2008). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Negotiating cultures of work in transnational law firms

James R. Faulconbridge*

*Department of Geography, Lancaster University, Farrer Avenue, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ. email <j.faulconbridge{at}lancaster.ac.uk>

JEL classifications: F23, L82, L84

The geographical strategies of transnational corporations have received extensive attention from economic geographers. A particularly important line of study has focused upon the diverse national institutions that create geographically heterogeneous cultures of work. Yet, none of these studies place questions about how global firms act as ‘cultural entrepreneurs’ at the centre of their analysis. This article, therefore, uses the case of transnational law firms to extend theoretical debates about the geographies of learning and best practice through new micro-scale consideration of the way managers in TNCs act as cultural entrepreneurs, driving change in institutionalized cultures of work through strategies that alter the cognitive frames of workers. Drawing primarily on data from interviews, the article reveals how the strategies used by influential partners in transnational law firms to drive changes in cultures of work do not lead to forms of global strong convergence in practice, but converging divergences as cultures change in subtle, often unpredicted ways. It is argued that economic geographers need to pay more attention to the mechanisms of such changes in culture, and the processes of change in national business systems more widely, so as not only to contribute to debates about corporate culture but also the varieties of capitalism.

Keywords: national business systems, varieties of capitalism, globalization, law firms, cultures of work
Date submitted: 14 September 2007     Date accepted: 7 March 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
J. R. Faulconbridge
The Regulation of Design in Global Architecture Firms: Embedding and Emplacing Buildings
Urban Stud, November 1, 2009; 46(12): 2537 - 2554.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J ECON GEOGRHome page
S. Hall and L. Appleyard
'City of London, City of Learning'? Placing business education within the geographies of finance
J. Econ. Geogr., September 1, 2009; 9(5): 597 - 617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ECON GEOGRHome page
J. R. Faulconbridge and D. Muzio
The financialization of large law firms: situated discourses and practices of reorganization
J. Econ. Geogr., September 1, 2009; 9(5): 641 - 661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
European Urban and Regional StudiesHome page
J. R. Faulconbridge, J. V. Beaverstock, B. Derudder, and F. Witlox
Corporate Ecologies of Business Travel in Professional Service Firms: Working Towards a Research Agenda
European Urban and Regional Studies, July 1, 2009; 16(3): 295 - 308.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.