Skip Navigation


Journal of Economic Geography Advance Access originally published online on July 30, 2007
Journal of Economic Geography 2007 7(6):737-752; doi:10.1093/jeg/lbm027
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
7/6/737    most recent
lbm027v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ó hUallacháin, B.
Right arrow Articles by Leslie, T. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow O18 - Regional, Urban, and Rural Analyses
Right arrow O31 - Innovation and Invention: [...]
Right arrow R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth [...]
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author (2007). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Rethinking the regional knowledge production function

Breandán Ó hUallacháin* and Timothy F. Leslie**

*Corresponding author: School of Geography Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287-0104, USA. email < ohuallachain{at}asu.edu>

**Department of Geography, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, 22030, USA. email < tleslie{at}gmu.edu>

JEL classifications:: O18, 031, R11

The knowledge production function is a questionable device for identifying the determinants of commercial patenting. Adapted from firm level analysis, it implicitly assumes that some mechanism exists to transfer research and development inputs across institutions to maximize invention output. Augmenting the approach with regional structure variables risks confounding causes and effects, because these conditions determine research and development in the first place. We contrast a knowledge production function and a regional structure model to identify the determinants of commercial patenting in US states in the period 2002–2004. Results show that human capital, specialized knowledge flows, urbanization and industry dominance in technical advance drive commercial patenting.

Keywords: invention, spillovers, regional economic development
Date submitted: 15 February 2007     Date accepted: 29 June 2007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.