Skip Navigation


Journal of Economic Geography Advance Access originally published online on June 18, 2007
Journal of Economic Geography 2007 7(5):573-601; doi:10.1093/jeg/lbm019
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
7/5/573    most recent
lbm019v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, R.
Right arrow Articles by Sunley, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow B52 - Institutional; Evolutionary
Right arrow O18 - Regional, Urban, and Rural Analyses
Right arrow R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, and Changes
Right arrow R12 - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author (2007). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Complexity thinking and evolutionary economic geography

Ron Martin* and Peter Sunley**

* Professor of Economic Geography, Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EN, UK. email < rlm1{at}cam.ac.uk>
** Professor of Human Geography, Department of Geography, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. email < P.J.Sunley{at}soton.ac.uk>

JEL classifications:: B520, O180, R110, R120

Thus far, most of the work towards the construction of an evolutionary economic geography has drawn upon a particular version of evolutionary economics, namely the Nelson-Winter framework, which blends Darwinian concepts and metaphors (especially variety, selection, novelty and inheritance) and elements of a behavioural theory of the firm. Much less attention has been directed to an alternative conception based on complexity theory, yet in recent years complexity theory has increasingly been concerned with the general attributes of evolutionary natural and social systems. In this article we explore the idea of the economic landscape as a complex adaptive system. We identify several key notions of what is being called the new ‘complexity economics’, and examine whether and in what ways these can be used to help inform an evolutionary perspective for understanding the uneven development and adaptive transformation of the economic landscape.

Keywords: complexity theory, evolution, economic landscape, networks, emergence, regional adaptation
Date submitted: 22 February 2007     Date accepted: 18 March 2007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Prog Hum GeogrHome page
M. Jones
Phase space: geography, relational thinking, and beyond
Progress in Human Geography, August 1, 2009; 33(4): 487 - 506.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Urban StudHome page
A. Beer and T. Clower
Specialisation and Growth: Evidence from Australia's Regional Cities
Urban Stud, February 1, 2009; 46(2): 369 - 389.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Prog Hum GeogrHome page
P. McManus and D. Gibbs
Industrial ecosystems? The use of tropes in the literature of industrial ecology and eco-industrial parks
Progress in Human Geography, August 1, 2008; 32(4): 525 - 540.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J ECON GEOGRHome page
K. Press
Divide to conquer? Limits to the adaptability of disintegrated, flexible specialization clusters
J. Econ. Geogr., July 1, 2008; 8(4): 565 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.