Skip Navigation

Journal of Economic Geography 2004 4(4):439-458; doi:10.1093/jnlecg/lbh029
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crozet, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow R23 - Regional Migration; Regional Labor Markets; [...]
Right arrow F12 - Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition [...]
Right arrow R12 - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional [...]
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Journal of Economic Geography, Vol. 4, No. 4, © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved.

Do migrants follow market potentials? An estimation of a new economic geography model

Matthieu Crozet*

* TEAM – University of Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne – CNRS, 106-112 Bd de l'Hôpital – 75657 Paris Cedex 13, France. email <crozet{at}univ-paris1.fr>

Abstract

New Economic Geography models describe a cumulative process of spatial agglomeration. Firms tend to cluster in locations with good access to demand, and similarly, workers are drawn to regions with good access to sources of supply. This paper provides an empirical assessment of this forward linkage that relates labour migrations to the geography of production through real wage differentials. In the spirit of Hanson (1998), we use bilateral migration data for five European countries over the 1980 s and 1990 s to perform quasi-structural estimations of a new economic geography model derived from Krugman (1991). The results show strong evidence in favor of this model. As expected, migrants do follow market potentials that measure the access to sources of supply. Moreover, we provide estimates for all key parameters of the model. These estimates suggest that a sudden emergence of a core-periphery pattern is unlikely within European countries; centripetal forces are too limited in geographical scope, and mobility costs are too high.

Keywords: economic geography, migration, European regions, agglomeration,
JEL classifications: F12, R12, R23
Date submitted: 1 June 2000     Date accepted: 15 January 2004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CESifo Economic StudiesHome page
H. Garretsen and J. Peeters
Capital Mobility, Agglomeration and Corporate Tax Rates: Is the Race to the Bottom for Real?
CESifo Economic Studies, June 4, 2007; (2007) ifm009v2.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.