Skip Navigation


Journal of Economic Geography Advance Access originally published online on March 1, 2009
Journal of Economic Geography 2009 9(6):779-804; doi:10.1093/jeg/lbp009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
9/6/779    most recent
lbp009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rappaport, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow O40 - General
Right arrow R12 - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity
Right arrow R13 - General Equilibrium and Welfare Economic Analysis of Regional Economies
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author (2009). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The increasing importance of quality of life{dagger}

Jordan Rappaport*

*Economic Research Department, 1 Memorial Drive Kansas City, MO 64198, USA. email <jordan.rappaport{at}kc.frb.org>

JEL classifications: O40, R12, R13

The US population has been migrating to places with high perceived quality of life. Theoretically, such migration can follow from the increasing demand for amenities that accompanies increasing wealth. Under the baseline calibration of a general equilibrium model, a place with amenities for which individuals would initially pay 5% of their income grows slightly faster than an otherwise identical place. As local quality of life becomes more important in determining relative population density, local productivity independently becomes less important. Together these two trends cause local amenities to eventually become the sole determinant of relative local density. From a quantitative perspective, high quality of life together with low relative productivity can boost metropolitan population growth by several percentage points.

Keywords: migration, consumption amenities, quality of life, productivity, urban agglomeration

{dagger}A previous version of this article was circulated under the title ‘Moving to High Quality of Life’.

Date submitted: 31 July 2007     Date accepted: 30 December 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.