Skip Navigation


Journal of Economic Geography Advance Access originally published online on February 14, 2005
Journal of Economic Geography 2005 5(3):365-379; doi:10.1093/jnlecg/lbh042
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
5/3/365    most recent
lbh042v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McDowell, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow H11 - Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government
Right arrow H31 - Household
Right arrow I38 - Government Policy; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
Right arrow J13 - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
Right arrow J16 - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
Right arrow J22 - Time Allocation and Labor Supply
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author (2005). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org


Debates and commentary

Love, money, and gender divisions of labour: some critical reflections on welfare-to-work policies in the UK

Linda McDowell*

* School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3TB. email <linda.mcdowell{at}ouce.ox.ac.uk>

The aim of this contribution to the debates section is to raise some research and policy questions about childcare which has become a key policy issue for the British Government. Childcare currently is a central plank of both the economic efficiency and the social exclusion agenda, as exemplified in welfare-to-work policies which aim to address the under-employment of low income parents as well as the social exclusion of working class children in certain parts of British cities. The uniting focus of this dual aim is the expansion of paid work for women, especially for single mothers and so childcare has become a key economic issue. Behind the introduction of welfare-to-work policies is a belief in the economic rationality of parents, especially mothers, who, it is believed, will use state-provide childcare to facilitate their labour market entry if the price of care is low enough and the standards acceptable. However, this assertion of economic rationality is challenged by research that documents parents' (especially mothers') moral commitments to their care for their dependants personally or through other forms of family-based provision. This commitment may limit the success of current welfare-to-work policies and/or suggest that new policy options may need to be considered, especially if greater social equity is an underlying aim. Suggestions for a new or expanded research agenda are included throughout the paper.

Keywords: welfare-to-work, child-care, economic efficiency, social exclusion,
JEL classifications: H11, H31, J13, J16 and J22
Date submitted: 19 December 2003     Date accepted: 3 June 2004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ECON GEOGRHome page
K. Strauss
Re-engaging with rationality in economic geography: behavioural approaches and the importance of context in decision-making
J. Econ. Geogr., March 1, 2008; 8(2): 137 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.