Skip Navigation


Journal of Economic Geography Advance Access originally published online on April 13, 2005
Journal of Economic Geography 2005 5(3):285-304; doi:10.1093/jeg/lbh063
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
5/3/285    most recent
lbh063v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bristow, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow R30 - General
Right arrow R58 - Regional Development Policy
Right arrow R10 - General
Right arrow R12 - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional [...]
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author (2005). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Everyone's a ‘winner’: problematising the discourse of regional competitiveness

Gillian Bristow*

* School of City and Regional Planning, Cardiff University, Glamorgan Building, King Edward VII Avenue, Cardiff CF10 3WA, UK. email <Bristowg1{at}cardiff.ac.uk>

Since the early 1990s, the concept of regional competitiveness has become a hegemonic discourse within public policy circles in developed countries. However, it is a somewhat chaotic and ill-defined discourse based on a relatively narrow conception of how regions compete, prosper and grow. This paper seeks to problematise the discourse with reference to theory, and to explain how and why it has assumed such significance in policy circles. It is argued that the answer lies within the policy process and the imperative of legitimating certain courses of policy action.

Keywords: competitiveness discourse, Porter, spatial competition, regional competitiveness indicators,
JEL classifications: R10, R12, R30, R58
Date submitted: 5 December 2003     Date accepted: 1 July 2004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Urban StudHome page
P. Boland
Unpacking the Theory-Policy Interface of Local Economic Development: An Analysis of Cardiff and Liverpool
Urban Stud, May 1, 2007; 44(5-6): 1019 - 1039.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J ECON GEOGRHome page
J. Harrison
From competitive regions to competitive city-regions: a new orthodoxy, but some old mistakes
J. Econ. Geogr., May 1, 2007; 7(3): 311 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PubliusHome page
K. Morgan
Devolution and Development: Territorial Justice and the North-South Divide
Publius, January 1, 2006; 36(1): 189 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.