Skip Navigation


Journal of Economic Geography Advance Access originally published online on February 14, 2005
Journal of Economic Geography 2005 5(2):155-176; doi:10.1093/jnlecg/lbh044
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
5/2/155    most recent
lbh044v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rey, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Janikas, M. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow C21 - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; [...]
Right arrow O18 - Regional, Urban, and Rural Analyses
Right arrow O51 - U.S.; Canada
Right arrow R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth [...]
Right arrow R12 - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional [...]
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author (2005). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions{at}oupjournals.org

Regional convergence, inequality, and space

Sergio J. Rey* and Mark V. Janikas**

* Department of Geography, San Diego State University, and the Regional Economics Applications Laboratory University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. email <serge{at}rohan.sdsu.edu>
** Department of Geography, San Diego State University email <janikas{at}rohan.sdsu.edu>

Abstract

The study of regional income convergence continues to attract enormous attention. Recent emphasis has been placed on the underlying spatial dimensions of regional growth processes both from theoretical and empirical perspectives, as well as from exploratory and confirmatory methodological stances. This paper provides a critical review of empirical approaches and methodological advances with an emphasis on the treatment of spatial effects, namely spatial dependence, spatial heterogeneity, and spatial scale. A number of areas that have been overlooked are highlighted, and the paper suggests a research agenda on regional growth empirics.

Keywords: ESDA (exploratory spatial data analysis), inequality measures, mobility metrics, spatial Markov,
JEL classifications: C21, O18, O51, R11, R12
Date submitted: 25 February 2004     Date accepted: 17 June 2004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J ECON GEOGRHome page
D. Yamamoto
Scales of regional income disparities in the USA, 1955 2003
J. Econ. Geogr., January 1, 2008; 8(1): 79 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Urban StudHome page
R. Ezcurra
Is Income Inequality Harmful for Regional Growth? Evidence from the European Union
Urban Stud, September 1, 2007; 44(10): 1953 - 1971.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Public Finance ReviewHome page
C. C. Coughlin, T. A. Garrett, and R. Hernandez-Murillo
Spatial Dependence in Models of State Fiscal Policy Convergence
Public Finance Review, May 1, 2007; 35(3): 361 - 384.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.