Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Potter, J.
Right arrow Articles by Spires, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow R58 - Regional Development Policy
Right arrow O31 - Innovation and Invention: [...]
Right arrow F23 - Multinational Firms; International Business
Right arrow L60 - General
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Economic Geography 2:279-310 (2002)
Copyright © 2002 Oxford University Press


Article

The wider effects of inward foreign direct investment in manufacturing on UK industry

Jonathan Potter*, Barry Moore** and Rod Spires***

*Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, LEED Programme, Territorial Development Service, 2 rue André-Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16, France. email <jonathan.potter{at}oecd.org>
**Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, 19 Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EP, UK. email <bcm1{at}cam.ac.uk>
***Public and Corporate Economic Consultants, 49–53 Regent Street, Cambridge CB2 1AB, UK. email <admin{at}pacec.co.uk>

Abstract

This paper examines the wider effects of inward foreign direct investment (FDI) to the UK on improving the practices and competitiveness of domestic industry. Surveyed domestic suppliers, competitors, and customers to foreign investors reported extensive positive impacts on their practices, focused particularly on reductions in X-inefficiencies, and on their competitiveness, although in the case of competitors benefits had to be balanced against adverse effects. Knowledge transfers through personal contacts and the demonstration effect, were important to the transmission of impacts, but a number of other channels were also important, including additional supplier sales, improved customer inputs, and the competitive spur. Regional policymakers should take these wider benefits into account in the design of policies for attracting and embedding foreign investment. However, whilst there was no evidence that foreign firms in assisted regions had fewer benefits than those in core regions, there was a lot of leakage outside of the areas attracting foreign firms, suggesting that policies to promote spillovers should not be developed entirely in a local or regional framework.

Keywords: FDI, innovation, technology transfer, spillovers

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.