Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lucas, R. E.B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Economic Geography 1:323-339 (2001)
Copyright © 2001 Oxford University Press


Article

The effects of proximity and transportation on developing country population migrations

Robert E.B. Lucas

Department of Economics, Boston University, 270 Bay State Road, Boston, MA 02215, USA. rlucas{at}bu.edu

Abstract

A substantial body of evidence indicates that distance deters migration, internally and internationally, in the industrialized as well as the developing economies. Despite this, distance plays almost no role either in the development literature or even the new economic geography. After a brief overview of the types of evidence on the role of distance in affecting migration, the paper critically examines a number of hypotheses as to why distance might deter migration, then draws out some implications for the emergence and persistence of geographic poverty traps. The paper closes with a series of suggestions for additional research and data needs, to better inform policy decisions that impinge upon the geographic distribution of poverty, and hence upon the potential for trickle-down development.

Keywords: migration, distance, networks, poverty traps

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cambridge J Regions Econ SocHome page
M. D. Partridge and D. S. Rickman
Place-based policy and rural poverty: insights from the urban spatial mismatch literature
Cambridge J Regions Econ Soc, April 1, 2008; 1(1): 131 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.